05-13-2006, 08:31 AM
Interesting new study from SiteAdvisor compares the safety of the different search engines' search results:
full study: http://www.siteadvisor.com/studies/searc...y2006.html
Quote:Abstract
We compare safety of leading search engines, using SiteAdvisor's automated Web site ratings. We find most leading search engines similar in the safety of the sites they link to, though MSN is the safest and Ask lags noticeably behind. Across search engines, we find sponsored results significantly less safe than search engines' organic results. We find heightened risks for certain keywords, including those frequently searched by kids and novice users. We began this project in January 2006, and our analysis uses search engine results and SiteAdvisor safety data from April 2006.
Quote:Key Findings
  * All the major search engines returned risky sites in their search results for popular keywords.
  * Overall, MSN search results had the lowest percentage (3.9%) of dangerous sites while Ask search results had the highest percentage (6.1%). Google was in between (5.3%).
  * Sponsored results contained two to four times as many dangerous sites as organic results.
  * There was little correlation between search result placement and safety. Page 1 results were only moderately safer than results for pages 2-5.
  * Dangerous sites soared to as much as 72% of results for certain risky keywords. Particularly dangerous keywords include "free screensavers", "bearshare", "kazaa", "download music", and "free games."
  * We estimate that US consumers make 285 million clicks to hostile sites every month as a result of search engine results.
full study: http://www.siteadvisor.com/studies/searc...y2006.html