Quote:Gee, I wonder if he'll create a new id and try again?
With someone having bid over $100 for an empty box, he certainly has incentive to keep trying.
Seems I remember the cheese sandwich was pulled, then restored after a letter from an attorney.
A man has a right to sell his wife's box (with her agreement, of course.) But there is another problem - what if his wife decides she does not want to give her box to the winner?
I can see the neg now -- did not provide box as advertised.
or worse -- attempted to substitute can for box.
^^
gosh. Just as a matter of trivia, did you notice how many of his feedbacks were from now-naru'd users? 6 out of 29! Seems to be a lot. ???
The 3rd auction violated the choice policy. Offering buyers a choice between your wife's box and can in the same listing isn't Ebay legal.
Quote:he's been NARU'd.
Thank you eBay for making your site safer by NARU'ing that menace to society! :
[quote author=regic link=topic=3213.msg11868#msg11868 date=1144186144]
Assuming eBay removes listings in order of the threat they pose to other users, eBay must have pulled all of the counterfeit, fraudulent, and phishing attempt listings first[/quote]
Quote:that menace to society!
Are you referring to his cock or to her box?
[quote author=jezebel link=topic=3213.msg11933#msg11933 date=1144290907]
Quote:that menace to society!
Are you referring to his cock or to her box?
[/quote]
Ummm....
Is this where the can gets kicked?
Proof once again of the creatitivity of eBay sellers and the lack of a sense of humor of eBay staff.
Imagine --- Naru'ed for an empty box.
Well, we do not know that the box is still empty, now do we.
BTW the listing was eBay legal, it was not a choice -- the can was stuck to the box.
eBay employees should get their minds out of the gutter!!!
