Can failure to filter porn spam be considered sexual harassment to employees?
|
04-12-2006, 06:00 PM,
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Can failure to filter porn spam be considered sexual harassment to employees?
Employee charges employer with sexual harassment because the employer's spam filters failed to filter out porn spam :
If a court ever decided that an employer's failure to filter all porn spam is sexual harassment then ISPs and email service providers would be guilty of sexual harassment too. Quote:In today's litigious society, common sense is often out the door with some juries with the "stick it to the man" mentality are eager to give large awards even when no real faults are found. In one of our more heated TechRepublic debates, member "sostermann" posts "Can porn spam be considered sexual harassment to employees?" Sostermann tells of a new employee who has complained to upper management stating "This is now border line harassing! Some employees would consider this sexual harassment." Quote:It would be unreasonable to hold an employer liable for any vulgar message than an employee may come across. full article: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=190 |
|||
04-12-2006, 10:59 PM,
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can failure to filter porn spam be considered sexual harassment to employees?
The comments are here: http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-11189-0.html?forumID=3&threadID=192859&start=0&tag=fdlead2
There isn't any way to filter 100% of spam or even porn spam unless you stop accepting ALL emails from outside your company. I'm having a hard time seeing how the employer could be guilty of sexual harassment because 3rd party email made it through a spam filter. ???
"Well, Jay was so giddy that someone named Jay was involved with this site we posted our first non-eBay listing in 3 years here at Lunarbid (we tried two items at Yahoo once upon a time, they bombed)" -Marie posting in a LunarBid thread at OTWA in 2005 wins the award for 'most moronic reason ever given for choosing a venue"
"thanks twat u must have nothing better 2 do. do u talk to all your members like that. will not be recomending your site. best way to put it is TULIPTOOLS.COM IS REALLY SHIT. DONT JOIN." -pubescent owner of rinky dink off2auction.com in 2011 |
|||
04-13-2006, 03:15 AM,
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can failure to filter porn spam be considered sexual harassment to employees?
Quote:It would be unreasonable to hold an employer liable for any vulgar message than an employee may come across. Vulgar messages from outside the company, yes it would be unreasonable because the employer has limited control. From inside the company, yes it is unreasonable to blame the employer if the message sending was a one-time event, and no it isn't unreasonable to hold the company liable if there is a repeated pattern of vulgar messages being sent and the employer hasn't taken steps to discipline the senders. |
|||
02-01-2008, 06:59 AM,
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can failure to filter porn spam be considered sexual harassment to employees
Hi,
I am agree with you ,it not possible to stop all the spam.And I don't think that sexual spams should be considered as sexual harassment.Though this is the responsibility of the employee one can not blame them for it. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Man gets busted by FBI for porn, Man sues Microsoft... | mandy | 3 | 3,106 |
03-04-2007, 09:43 PM Last Post: BellisimaJ. |
|
Study: 42% of Internet users Aged 10-17 have seen online Porn | mandy | 5 | 3,974 |
02-06-2007, 07:09 PM Last Post: BellisimaJ. |
|
New York Lawmaker sues Google alleging it profits from ads for child porn sites | mandy | 1 | 2,884 |
06-24-2006, 09:50 AM Last Post: mandy |
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)